PMMI ProSource – Start Your Search
Check out our packaging and processing solutions finder, PMMI ProSource.

Real-time monitoring in the cold chain

While a number of new tools exist that provide real-time monitoring of the cold chain, how much data is too much? And, what can be done when excursions are identified?

Left to right: Mark Lovell, Shire Pharmaceuticals; Bill Rambo, Panther Life Science Logistics; Arminda O. Montero, AbbVie Inc.; and Jack Rubarth, Gemalto Inc.
Left to right: Mark Lovell, Shire Pharmaceuticals; Bill Rambo, Panther Life Science Logistics; Arminda O. Montero, AbbVie Inc.; and Jack Rubarth, Gemalto Inc.

In the pharmaceutical cold chain, recent technological innovations have made real-time monitoring of high-value shipments a reality, providing data on temperature, pressure, shock, and a variety of other conditions, at every point along the supply chain. But how much information is too much? And how can this data be used to implement an effective, timely response? These were issues discussed throughout several presentations given Oct. 3 at the 11th Annual Cold Chain GDP & Temperature Management Logistics Global Forum, held in Chicago.

Said Bill Rambo, Vertical Director, Panther Life Science Logistics, “We’ve taught cargo how to speak, but are we ready for what it’s going to tell us?”

Rambo moderated a panel discussion titled, “Optimizing the Way you Ship Cold Chain Products: Investing in Technology and Services,” in which panelists answered questions on how they select and implement new technologies within their respective companies. Among the panelists were Arminda O. Montero, Program Manager, QA, Supply Chain Operations, AbbVie Inc.; Mark Lovell, Senior Cold Chain Specialist, Shire Pharmaceuticals; and Jack Rubarth, SensorLogic M2M Platform – Cold Chain Solutions, Gemalto Inc.

When Rambo asked panelists what their one “must-have” technology is, Montero responded: “We look at our mission in global QA for distribution and logistics, and that is to protect the product and the supply chain, and determine where the highest risks exist of not being able to protect the product. We look for technologies that will enable us to minimize that risk, either through controls and/or monitoring. We look at better controls solutions in different packaging or active containers. We also look at monitoring because if something does go wrong, we need to know as soon as possible, while it’s still in transit, and not weeks later—that has an impact on the supply chain as well.”

Said Rubarth, “There is no such thing as a silver bullet. It’s not just one-size-fits-all. If you walk the [exhibit] floor, you will see there are a lot of solution providers out there going to real-time tracking and monitoring services, and I think that’s where I see the most innovation happening. But again, it’s not going to work for everybody.

“If you’ve got a shipment, and you get an alert saying it’s in Chile sitting on the tarmac in the middle of the night, great, but what are you going to do about it? There’s not going to be somebody sitting there at the station who’s going to look at the monitor and take it back into an icing station. So some of that is you have to be careful about what you ask for, because some of it might be too much.”

Agreed Lovell, “From a technology standpoint, real time monitoring offers a lot of great advantages, some not so great. It provides a lot of value, but the challenge is being able to utilize all the data. Do you have a service provider who can intervene if there is a temperature excursion?