There  are a number of hurdles related to dispensers complying with Drug Supply Chain  Security Act (DSCSA) requirements including: 
- They aren’t being left  with much time to implement data exchange systems
 - Some smaller or less-connected  players may be unaware of the requirements and the need to prepare
 - The costs to implement  traceability systems may be prohibitive, particularly without a way to directly  recoup the funds
 
The  HDA 2022 Traceability Seminar this week in Washington D.C. shined a light on  the dispenser (pharmacy) community’s efforts. During a panel on dispenser data  flow, an audience member asked how data exceptions might affect patients in  real-time. In the scenario he described, a pharmacy tells a patient to come in  at 10am when their prescription is set to be filled, but they discover upon  attempting to fill that they haven’t received traceability data for that  product and cannot fill the prescription.
[Editor’s  note: Panelists spoke on this topic during the Q&A portion from the  audience. As such, their statements were made off-the-cuff. They may include  conjecture and do not necessarily reflect official policies.]
Leon  Nevers is the director, procurement and business development at H-E-B. He explained  that when a pharmacist is out of an item, there are typically opportunities to  fill other items, whether by offering an OTC medication or sourcing from a DSP  [distance selling pharmacy] depending on customer needs. “On the labor impacts  side, I have a pharmacist that really should just be delivering a prescription  to the customer in the way that they want it. That's a dissatisfaction for the  customer when they don't receive that, so that's step one. Step two is that pharmacist  now that has to go and counsel that customer and probably walk them out to the  to OTC aisle or walk through what their options are and that's time,” he said.
If  a given supplier is causing these kinds of interruptions frequently, Nevers  said he may have to consider moving product from that supplier until they can  get their data in shape and prove they can send it correctly.
Lisa  Schwartz, PharmD, RPh, senior director, professional affairs, National  Community Pharmacists, echoed this sentiment, adding that it would likely be  treated as an “out of stock”—despite having the product in the facility it  cannot be dispensed compliantly. “You do end up at some point having to make an  evaluation of doing business with a trading partner,” she said. She also noted  that at some point, a pharmacy owner may be made an example of if they do take  the risk to dispense product without having tracing data.
Ian  Cannell, practice leader consultant/DSCSA project lead at Kaiser Permanente,  said it’s the elephant in the room. “The question is, how do you not fumble on  the one-yard line?” He agreed with the other panelists about sourcing from  another pharmacy or finding alternatives: “Can we place an overnight or  emergency order? Can we pick another SKU? Is there another choice that can be  used? I think your original question a lot was policy and procedure. Every  organization needs to take a hard cold look at their compliance and legal  department when it comes to if you have a worst-case scenario, whether it's  compliance versus the reality of a critical patient need… it goes back to  trying to mitigate these risks in advance.”
Cannell  also noted that dispensers have limited resources and limited serialization  providers. To avoid bottlenecks, the best practice is to try and get ahead and identify  trading partners with data issues in advance to try to mitigate those scenarios  from happening. But that some partners may lose business if they are putting dispensers  at risk by not supplying proper product data. 
                                                                            
Nevers  added that accurate operations upstream should help mitigate the issue. “So [product]  is coming in and we receive at the warehouse. If our employees are scanning and  they find ‘no data,’ your stuff is not going to go any further, and we're not going  to pay you for it. That kind of defeats the purpose of what we're working  together on.” He concluded that he does not intend to put his customers or  pharmacists at risk by moving product out of the warehouse and into the stores when  they don't have data on where it came from.