Packaging vaccines for pandemic flu or bioterrorist attack: Are we ready?

A Congressional blue-ribbon panel believes, "Terrorists are likely to use a weapon of mass destruction somewhere in the world in the next five years," according to a Dec. 2 CNN report. Biological weapons are more readily available than nuclear devices, and their attacks would be easier to carry out, notes former Senator Bob Graham in the report. From a packaging perspective, are we ready for such an attack? Healthcare Packaging publisher Jim Chrzan addresses the issue, based on a recent International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering annual meeting session that dealt with offering rapid response for vaccine creation for a pandemic flu or bioterrorist attack.

The U.S. government has issued the challenge: Within 12 weeks of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention providing a sample, can we create 10 million doses to inoculate early responders?
Can we create the vaccines using a mobile, disposable platform that can be sent anywhere in the world at a moment's notice, versus at a bricks-and-mortar facility that could fall prey to anthrax, bomb, or missile attack?

While much attention was given to developing the vaccines, packaging was completely ignored. Are these vaccine doses in glass vials, plastic blow/fill/seal containers, or prefilled syringes? And will these be placed in trays, cartons, or cold shippers? Are we planning on stocking and shipping these primary packages/delivery systems to the vaccine-processing site? Will doses be distributed individually or in batches?

Will we be able to offer instructions/warnings in any language or do we have a "universal" approach using pictograms?

And what about the packaging machinery needed to protect and distribute the doses? We get 12 weeks to make sure the machines running these trays, cartons, and cases are shipped to the right place, reassembled, tested, and made ready to package. If these machines happen to end up in Saudi Arabia, are the recipes on the Human Machine Interface in English? And what about validation?

Will enough cartons or cases for 10 million doses be stored for quick response? After years in storage will the materials still run? Or will they need to be periodically replaced?

It is possible all these packaging-related questions have been considered and factored into the tests, but I did not hear a word. I sincerely hope this is not another case of packaging being excluded from discussions until it's too late to offer any significant creative input. [HCP]

--By Jim Chrzan, Publisher
Researched List: Blister Machines for Life Sciences
Need a blister machine for life sciences packaging? Our curated list features companies serving pharmaceutical, medical device, nutraceutical, and cosmetic industries. Download to access company names, locations, machine specifications, descriptions, and more.
Download Now
Researched List: Blister Machines for Life Sciences
List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO
Looking for CPG-focused digital transformation solutions? Download our editor-curated list from PACK EXPO featuring top companies offering warehouse management, ERP, digital twin, and MES software with supply chain visibility and analytics capabilities—all tailored specifically for CPG operations.
Download Now
List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO