Biologics and clinical trial materials in the cold chain

Seven cold chain executives discuss their plans to adapt their temperature-controlled supply chains to the worldwide growth of biologics and clinical trial materials.

This photo shows the report cover of Biologics and clinical trial materials in the cold chain.
This photo shows the report cover of Biologics and clinical trial materials in the cold chain.

The 11th Cold Chain Global Forum will take place Sept. 30-Oct. 4 in Chicago. This article from IQPC addresses “Biologics and clinical trial materials in the cold chain,” with input from the following industry experts:

• Karl Kussow, Manager of Quality & Validation, FedEx Custom Critical
• Bob Seevers, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly
• Kaley Parkinson, Supply Chain Technology Services, Rehrig Pacific
• Mary Foster, Chair, Expert Committee on Packaging, Storage & Distribution, USP
• Michael Burdick, Special Agent, Security & Hazardous Materials, FAA
• Berkley Stafford, Head of Healthcare Sales, Envirotainer
• Ben VanderPlas, Global Product Manager for ISC Labs, Sonoco ThermoSafe

Karl Kussow, Manager of Quality & Validation, FedEx Custom Critical, on the similarities between biologics & clinical trial materials:

“Biologics and clinical trials have in common their frequent need for closely controlled temperature ranges and no tolerance for any temperature excursion. They are also often being transported internationally. Systems that provide improved visibility and control, even during international clearance operations are important. Sense Aware and Shipment Watch are two such services that provide the kind of visibility often needed by these types of products. Shipment Watch is a device monitoring service that utilizes Sense Aware devices.”

Bob Seevers, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly, on dealing with the lack of set standards:

“We are looking to come up with a standard data set that we can have available at the time we submit our biomolecules for marketing approval. This is challenging because there is not a regulatory document available that provides a government approved set of expectations. The closest thing to this is PDA Technical Report 53 Guidance for Industry: Stability Testing to Support Distribution of New Drug Products (2011), which provides recommendations of the type of testing that should be considered.

“The fact is that testing that was once viewed as strictly for GMP purposes has come to be expected to be reported on and reviewed in marketing applications. We are looking into which tests to run and also at the timing to ensure that the results are available in time for submission of the marketing application. For clinical trial materials we are doing the same thing, but with the added complication that manufacturing processes and formulations change during the development process. Further, the amount of data available will change and increase as a biologic passes through the development process. And, sadly, many molecules will not make it to the market; we need to determine the correct investment in testing to support distribution during different phases of development.”

Kaley Parkinson, Supply Chain Technology Services, Rehrig Pacific, on handling increased costs:

List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO
Looking for CPG-focused digital transformation solutions? Download our editor-curated list from PACK EXPO featuring top companies offering warehouse management, ERP, digital twin, and MES software with supply chain visibility and analytics capabilities—all tailored specifically for CPG operations.
Download Now
List: Digitalization Companies From PACK EXPO
Researched List: Blister Machines for Life Sciences
Need a blister machine for life sciences packaging? Our curated list features companies serving pharmaceutical, medical device, nutraceutical, and cosmetic industries. Download to access company names, locations, machine specifications, descriptions, and more.
Download Now
Researched List: Blister Machines for Life Sciences